Same inventor, same target, different exam

McMaster University built both instruments to solve the same problem: grades and test scores predict classroom performance, not professional behavior. The MMI (introduced in the early 2000s) and CASPer (developed as its scalable online sibling) both measure professionalism, ethical reasoning, communication, and empathy — scored by independent raters, one per scenario, so no single bad moment sinks the result. The resemblance ends at the mechanics.

Where each sits in the funnel

CASPer screens; the MMI decides. CASPer is taken early — often before secondaries are even reviewed — and functions as a filter on who receives an interview invitation. The MMI happens months later and dominates the final decision at schools that use it. That placement drives preparation priority: CASPer earns you the room, the MMI converts it.

The mechanical differences that change preparation

  • Medium. CASPer responses are typed (plus recorded video-response sections in the current format); MMI answers are spoken to a live rater or actor. Typing speed genuinely matters on CASPer; vocal composure genuinely matters on the MMI.
  • Interaction. CASPer never talks back. The MMI probes: raters ask follow-ups, actors in role-play stations respond to what you actually said. Interactive pressure is the MMI's distinguishing difficulty and cannot be practiced on paper.
  • Time shape. CASPer compresses: several questions in a few minutes per scenario, favoring fast structured typing. The MMI stretches: 5-8 minutes on one scenario, favoring depth, recovery, and the ability to keep reasoning aloud after your first point is exhausted.
  • Feedback loop. You never see your CASPer responses or scores in detail. MMI practice, done properly, produces reviewable performances — recordings, scored dimensions — which is why deliberate practice moves MMI scores faster.

Preparing for CASPer

Drill the reasoning pattern, not answers: identify the conflict, name the perspectives and what each stands to lose, state a course of action with its justification, and acknowledge what would change your mind — in about three typed sentences per question. Practice against a countdown clock, because unanswered questions score zero and the time pressure is the test's real difficulty. Ethical frameworks (autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, justice) are worth internalizing to the point of reflex.

Preparing for the MMI

Everything about MMI preparation is performance practice: cold prompts, two minutes of silent prep, spoken answers against a timer, follow-up probes, and rotation across ethics, policy, role-play, teamwork, and personal stations. The full method is in how to practice for the MMI; the one-line version is that anything you do silently or in writing is CASPer practice, not MMI practice.

The MMI half is the half you can actually train.

AdmitBase's AI mock interviews run timed MMI stations out loud — fresh scenarios every time, follow-up probes, and scored feedback on the same dimensions raters use. Your first station is free.

Try a Free MMI Station →

Sequencing both in one cycle

CASPer dates cluster early in the application cycle; interviews begin months later. The efficient sequence is short and front-loaded CASPer preparation (one to two weeks of timed typing drills before your sitting), then a deliberate MMI block in the weeks before interview season — three weeks of rotating station practice is a common structure. Applicants who invert this — agonizing over CASPer all summer, then cramming the MMI in a weekend — misallocate against where the decision actually gets made.